Impact of nucleic acid testing relative to antigen/antibody combination immunoassay on the detection of acute HIV infection

MS De Souza, N Phanuphak, S Pinyakorn… - Aids, 2015 - journals.lww.com
MS De Souza, N Phanuphak, S Pinyakorn, R Trichavaroj, S Pattanachaiwit, N Chomchey…
Aids, 2015journals.lww.com
Objective: To assess the addition of HIV nucleic acid testing (NAT) to fourth-generation
(4thG) HIV antigen/antibody combination immunoassay in improving detection of acute HIV
infection (AHI). Methods: Participants attending a major voluntary counseling and testing site
in Thailand were screened for AHI using 4thG HIV antigen/antibody immunoassay and
sequential less sensitive HIV antibody immunoassay. Samples nonreactive by 4thG
antigen/antibody immunoassay were further screened using pooled NAT to identify …
Abstract
Objective:
To assess the addition of HIV nucleic acid testing (NAT) to fourth-generation (4thG) HIV antigen/antibody combination immunoassay in improving detection of acute HIV infection (AHI).
Methods:
Participants attending a major voluntary counseling and testing site in Thailand were screened for AHI using 4thG HIV antigen/antibody immunoassay and sequential less sensitive HIV antibody immunoassay. Samples nonreactive by 4thG antigen/antibody immunoassay were further screened using pooled NAT to identify additional AHI. HIV infection status was verified following enrollment into an AHI study with follow-up visits and additional diagnostic tests.
Results:
Among 74 334 clients screened for HIV infection, HIV prevalence was 10.9% and the overall incidence of AHI (N= 112) was 2.2 per 100 person-years. The inclusion of pooled NAT in the testing algorithm increased the number of acutely infected patients detected, from 81 to 112 (38%), relative to 4thG HIV antigen/antibody immunoassay. Follow-up testing within 5 days of screening marginally improved the 4thG immunoassay detection rate (26%). The median CD4+ T-cell count at the enrollment visit was 353 cells/μl and HIV plasma viral load was 598 289 copies/ml.
Conclusion:
The incorporation of pooled NAT into the HIV testing algorithm in high-risk populations may be beneficial in the long term. The addition of pooled NAT testing resulted in an increase in screening costs of 22% to identify AHI: from $8.33 per screened patient to $10.16. Risk factors of the testing population should be considered prior to NAT implementation given the additional testing complexity and costs.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins